Taxpayer claims he did not get CRA notices in mail, however courtroom disagrees

Article content material

In your dealings with the Canada Income Company, you’ve got the choice to obtain its notices by both common mail or e-mail, however both approach, the taxman assumes you obtain them until you may show in any other case, as one taxpayer has discovered.

A current tax case, determined in September, handled a taxpayer who claimed to have by no means acquired numerous CRA notices coping with tax reassessments for a number of tax years. The Windsor, Ont., mail provider at one time additionally owned a nail salon. That enterprise was audited by the CRA, which finally despatched the taxpayer notices of reassessment for his 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2016 taxation years. He didn’t file notices of objection in time to problem these reassessments, and he additionally missed the deadlines to use for extensions.

Article content material

Article content material

Underneath the Revenue Tax Act, the deadline for people to file an objection is one 12 months from the conventional submitting due date or 90 days after the date printed in your discover of (re)evaluation, whichever is later. Virtually talking, meaning in the event you filed your 2022 return by the Might 1, 2023, basic submitting deadline and also you acquired your evaluation this previous summer season, you’ve got till Might 1, 2024, to file an objection.

If you happen to miss the deadline, you may nonetheless apply to the CRA for an extension inside one 12 months. That utility should embrace the explanations you didn’t object earlier than the deadline and needs to be addressed to the Chief of Appeals at an Appeals Consumption Centre. You’ll must exhibit that you simply have been unable to object throughout the time restrict, you have been unable to instruct another person to behave for you, you had a “bona fide intention to object,” it might be “simply and equitable” to increase the deadline and that your utility was made as quickly as circumstances permitted. Ought to the CRA deny your utility or in the event you don’t obtain a response from the CRA inside 90 days, you might additional attraction to the Tax Courtroom of Canada.

Article content material

Article content material

Within the current case, the CRA testified it despatched notices of reassessment by mail on July 4, 2016, to the taxpayer for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 tax years, however he claimed he by no means acquired them. He solely discovered about them after retaining a tax accountant in late 2019. The accountant, who represented the taxpayer in courtroom, filed an utility on June 9, 2022, for an extension of time to object to these reassessments.

The taxpayer’s argument was that he merely didn’t obtain the notices of reassessments. He testified that the CRA’s correspondence was “sporadic at greatest,” however was unable to provide any copies or data of any such correspondence. The choose puzzled whether or not the taxpayer had acquired any mail from the CRA, and if he did, when. He additionally puzzled whether or not he acquired any mail from different senders.

The choose, after confirming the taxpayer’s handle on file was appropriate and correct, and that he did, finally, object to every of the reassessments, presumed the taxpayer will need to have acquired the CRA’s notices, including that his allegation “lacked any factual basis, which is unusual, notably because the (taxpayer) himself is a mail provider.”

Article content material

The taxpayer’s discover of objection wasn’t filed till January 2017, effectively past the 90-day deadline to object. Per week later, the CRA wrote to tell him that his discover of objection wasn’t legitimate because it was late. The letter went on to say he had one 12 months from the expiration of the 90-day interval to use to the CRA for an extension of time to serve a discover of objection. Whereas the taxpayer did, finally, file an utility with the CRA for such an extension, he waited till Might 2018 to take action, which was past the one-year interval, which expired on Oct. 3, 2017, one 12 months after the 90-day deadline following the July 4, 2016, reassessments.

As for the 2015 and 2016 tax years, the CRA stated it despatched notices of reassessment to the taxpayer by way of e-mail, with the 2015 reassessment dated Jan. 6, 2021, and the 2016 reassessment dated Dec. 24, 2020. The CRA despatched these notices by way of e-mail as a result of the taxpayer on March 10, 2020, approved the CRA to take action by enrolling within the CRA’s My Account system.

Taxpayers who select the e-mail possibility for his or her correspondence get an e-mail notification when there’s new mail from the CRA to view in My Account and don’t obtain a paper copy within the mail. Examples of CRA mail you may presently obtain on-line embrace: notices of evaluation and reassessment, profit notices, adjustment notices, instalment reminders and letters asking for data and documentation for numerous authorities applications.

Article content material

It’s vital to do not forget that in the event you supplied your e-mail handle while you filed your paper or digital private T1 tax return, you’ve got robotically registered to obtain e-mail notifications from the CRA and agreed to the Company’s phrases of use in Step 1 of the information. Included amongst these phrases and situations is the assertion that every one CRA mail accessible in My Account is “presumed to have been acquired on the date that the e-mail notification is shipped. It’s your duty to be sure that the e-mail handle supplied to the CRA is updated.”

In our case right here, the final date on which the taxpayer might have filed an utility for an extension of time to object to the reassessment for his 2015 taxation 12 months was April 6, 2022, one 12 months after the 90-day deadline from Jan. 6, 2021. For the 2016 tax 12 months, the deadline to file for such an extension was March 24, 2022.

The choose dominated that as a result of the taxpayer didn’t file for extension purposes by their respective deadlines, the Tax Courtroom was unable to grant the extensions requested for all 5 years below reassessment. Thus, the taxpayer was successfully precluded from disputing any of these reassessments.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

If you happen to appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s essential to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

Article content material